1. The Proposed Development does not overlap with the Gladhouse Reservoir SPA and Ramsar site, so potential impacts on its qualifying features will only occur as a result of individuals from the SPA occurring in the area (or vicinity) of the Proposed Development.
  2. Consequently, the focus of the assessment for this SPA and Ramsar site population is concerned with the conservation objective to maintain or restore the populations of each qualifying feature. The other conservation objectives either apply to the site itself, and not to areas beyond the boundary, or are encompassed by the assessment of this conservation objective.
  3. Further information on this European site is presented in appendix 3A.
  4. The potential for LSE has been identified in relation to one of one qualifying features for this SPA and Ramsar site.
Project alone and in-combination: operation and maintenance
Migratory collision risk
  1. A single species was screened in (pink-footed goose), which was considered within the MSS strategic level report ( Table 5.305   Open ▸ ). The adjusted increase in baseline mortality was under the 0.95% threshold for this species ( Table 5.305   Open ▸ ). Therefore, a conclusion can be made of no Adverse Effect on Integrity with regards to the Gladhouse Reservoir SPA and Ramsar site as a result of collision risk from the Proposed Development either alone or in-combination with other plans and projects for pink-footed goose.

Site conclusion

  1. In conclusion, with reference to the conservation objectives set for the features of this site, it can be concluded that there is no potential for an Adverse Effect on Integrity on the Gladhouse Reservoir SPA and Ramsar Site. This finding is in relation to potential impacts associated with the Proposed Development in any or all phases, acting alone and or in-combination for migratory collision and barrier effects.

 

Table 5.305:
Qualifying Features of the Gladhouse Reservoir SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

Table 5.305: Qualifying Features of the Gladhouse Reservoir SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

 

5.8.17.              South Tayside Goose Roosts SPA and Ramsar Site

European site information and conservation objectives

  1. South Tayside Goose Roosts SPA and Ramsar site are located in the region of 56.26°N, 3.83°W and comprises an area of 3.32 km2. The two designations are significantly overlapped and are considered together. The area qualifies under Article 4.1 by regularly supporting populations of waterbird species as detailed below.
  2. The conservation objectives of this SPA (as determined from NatureScot’s SiteLink SPA Citation UK9004401) are:
  • To avoid deterioration of the habitats of the qualifying species (listed below) or significant disturbance to the qualifying species, thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained; and
  • To ensure for the qualifying species that the following are maintained in the long term:

–           Population of the species as a viable component of the site;

–           Distribution of the species within site;

–           Distribution and extent of habitats supporting the species;

–           Structure, function and supporting processes of habitats supporting the species; and

–           No significant disturbance of the species.

  1. The Proposed Development does not overlap with the South Tayside Goose roosts SPA and Ramsar site, so potential impacts on its qualifying features will only occur as a result of individuals from the SPA occurring in the area (or vicinity) of the Proposed Development.
  2. Consequently, the focus of the assessment for this SPA and Ramsar site population is concerned with the conservation objective to maintain or restore the populations of each qualifying feature. The other conservation objectives either apply to the site itself, and not to areas beyond the boundary, or are encompassed by the assessment of this conservation objective.
  3. Further information on this European site is presented in appendix 3A.
  4. The potential for LSE has been identified in relation to three of the three qualifying features for this SPA and Ramsar site.
Project alone and in-combination: operation and maintenance
Migratory collision risk
  1. All three features screened in (greylag goose, pink-footed goose and wigeon) were considered within the MSS strategic level report ( Table 5.306   Open ▸ ). Of these, the adjusted increase in baseline mortality was under the 0.95% threshold for all species ( Table 5.306   Open ▸ ). Therefore, a conclusion can be made of no Adverse Effect on Integrity with regards to the South Tayside Goose roosts SPA and Ramsar site as a result of collision risk from the Proposed Development either alone or in-combination with other plans and projects for all three species.

Site conclusion

  1. In conclusion, with reference to the conservation objectives set for the features of this site, it can be concluded that there is no potential for an Adverse Effect on Integrity on the South Tayside Goose roosts SPA and Ramsar site. This finding is in relation to potential impacts associated with the Proposed Development in any or all phases, acting alone and or in-combination for migratory collision and barrier effects.

 

Table 5.306:
Qualifying Features of the South Tayside Goose roosts SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

Table 5.306: Qualifying Features of the South Tayside Goose roosts SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

 

5.8.18.              Westwater SPA and Ramsar Site (Estuarine)

European site information and conservation objectives

  1. Westwater SPA and Ramsar site are located 55.75°N, 3.40W° and comprises an area of 0.49 km2. The two designations are significantly overlapped and are considered together. The area qualifies under Article 4.1 by regularly supporting populations of waterbird species as detailed below.
  2. The conservation objectives of this SPA (as determined from NatureScot’s SiteLink SPA Citation UK9004251) are:
  • To avoid deterioration of the habitats of the qualifying species (listed below) or significant disturbance to the qualifying species, thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained; and
  • To ensure for the qualifying species that the following are maintained in the long term:

–      Population of the species as a viable component of the site;

–      Distribution of the species within site;

–      Distribution and extent of habitats supporting the species;

–      Structure, function and supporting processes of habitats supporting the species; and

–      No significant disturbance of the species.

  1. The Proposed Development does not overlap with the Westwater SPA and Ramsar site, so potential impacts on its qualifying features will only occur as a result of individuals from the SPA occurring in the area (or vicinity) of the Proposed Development.
  2. Consequently, the focus of the assessment for this SPA and Ramsar site population is concerned with the conservation objective to maintain or restore the populations of each qualifying feature. The other conservation objectives either apply to the site itself, and not to areas beyond the boundary, or are encompassed by the assessment of this conservation objective.
  3. Further information on this European site is presented in appendix 3A.
  4. The potential for LSE has been identified in relation to one of these 25 qualifying features for this SPA and Ramsar site.
Project alone and in-combination: operation and maintenance
Migratory collision risk
  1. A single species was screened in (pink-footed goose), which was considered within the MSS strategic level report ( Table 5.307   Open ▸ ). The adjusted increase in baseline mortality was under the 0.95% threshold for this species ( Table 5.307   Open ▸ ). Therefore, a conclusion can be made of no Adverse Effect on Integrity with regards to the Westwater SPA and Ramsar site as a result of collision risk from the Proposed Development either alone or in-combination with other plans and projects for pink-footed goose.

Site conclusion

  1. In conclusion, with reference to the conservation objectives set for the features of this site, it can be concluded that there is no potential for an Adverse Effect on Integrity on the Westwater SPA and Ramsar Site. This finding is in relation to potential impacts associated with the Proposed Development in any or all phases, acting alone and or in-combination for migratory collision and barrier effects.

 

Table 5.307:
Qualifying Features of the Westwater SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

Table 5.307:  Qualifying Features of the Westwater SPA and Ramsar Site, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

 

5.8.19.              Slamannan Plateau SPA (Estuarine)

European site information and conservation objectives

  1. The Slamannan Plateau SPA is located at 55.94°N, 3.90°W and comprises an area of 5.90 km2. The area qualifies under Article 4.1 by regularly supporting populations of waterbird species as detailed below.
  2. The conservation objectives of this SPA (as determined from NatureScot’s SiteLink SPA Citation UK9004441) are:
  • To avoid deterioration of the habitats of the qualifying species (listed below) or significant disturbance to the qualifying species, thus ensuring that the integrity of the site is maintained; and
  • To ensure for the qualifying species that the following are maintained in the long term:

–      Population of the species as a viable component of the site;

–      Distribution of the species within site;

–      Distribution and extent of habitats supporting the species;

–      Structure, function and supporting processes of habitats supporting the species; and

–      No significant disturbance of the species.

  1. The Proposed Development does not overlap with the Slamannan SPA, so potential impacts on its qualifying features will only occur as a result of individuals from the SPA occurring in the area (or vicinity) of the Proposed Development.
  2. Consequently, the focus of the assessment for this SPA population is concerned with the conservation objective to maintain or restore the populations of each qualifying feature. The other conservation objectives either apply to the site itself, and not to areas beyond the boundary, or are encompassed by the assessment of this conservation objective.
  3. Further information on this European site is presented in appendix 3A.
  4. The potential for LSE has been identified in relation to one of the one qualifying features for this SPA.
Project alone and in-combination: operation and maintenance
Migratory collision risk
  1. A single species was screened in (Taiga bean goose), which was considered within the MSS strategic level report ( Table 5.308   Open ▸ ). The adjusted increase in baseline mortality was over the 0.95% threshold for this species ( Table 5.308   Open ▸ ). Therefore, Taiga bean goose was taken forward for additional assessment within this report.
Additional assessment of taiga bean goose
  1. The Scottish population of Taiga bean geese consists predominantly of overwintering birds (c.250) with 10-100 individuals observed during migration passage each year. In the MSS strategic level report, these counts were totalled to give 350 individuals at risk each migration periods, with no accounting for the known variability in migrating individuals. It is currently unknown how populations of Taiga bean geese migrate across Scotland and the North Sea, with the limited tracking data suggesting a proportion of individuals present at the Slamannan Plateau SPA may transit through England and not directly from Scandinavia (Michell et al., 2016). This would affect the outcomes of the assessment process undertaken within this report and the MSS strategic level report.
  2. The values presented here based on the outputs on the MSS strategic level report assume that the entire Scottish population transits the migration front used within the MSS strategic level report analysis, however the limited tracking data available suggests this is likely not the case, especially during the autumn migration (Figure 4, Michell et al., 2016). Consequently, it is likely the true numbers migrating close to the Proposed Development are lower than currently used in the MSS strategic level report, and therefore collisions would be expected to be fewer than currently estimated.
  3. As in the MSS strategic level report, the total migratory population of Taiga bean goose assessed is 700 birds in both the spring and autumn migration periods. From this the MSS strategic report estimated 3 collisions, which after adjustment for updated number of wind turbines as presented in this report resulted in a calculation of increased baseline mortality of 2.6%. However, the MSS strategic report used a precautionary avoidance rate of 98%. Recently published guidance recommends using an avoidance rate of 99.8% for goose species (NatureScot, 2018), which would theoretically result in approximately an 87.5% reduction in collisions. This would subsequently reduce Taiga bean goose increased baseline mortality to less than the 0.95% threshold presented here. Taiga bean goose is therefore scoped out of further analysis as it is thought unlikely for there to be Adverse Effect on Integrity on this species for Proposed development alone or in-combination.
  4. This would therefore decrease the number of potential collisions, likely bringing any potential increased baseline mortality estimates from this report and the MSS strategic level report to below levels of no significance. Taiga bean goose is therefore screened out of further assessment.

Site conclusion

  1. In conclusion, with reference to the conservation objectives set for the features of this site, it can be concluded that there is no potential for an Adverse Effect on Integrity on the Slamannan Plateau SPA. This finding is in relation to potential impacts associated with the Proposed Development in any or all phases, acting alone and or in-combination for migratory collision and barrier effects.

 

Table 5.308:
Qualifying Features of the Slamannan Plateau SPA, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

Table 5.308: Qualifying Features of the Slamannan Plateau SPA, With Calculations of Additional Mortality (From MSS Strategic Level Report) and Corrected Additional Mortality With Updated Turbine Numbers) Population Data as Available in Most Recently Updated in Most Recent Site Data Form

*see additional assessment of aiga bean goose.

6.             Conclusions

6. Conclusions

Table 6.1:
Summary of Potential Adverse Effect on Integrity (AEoI) for Breeding Seabird SPAs for Proposed Development alone (Alone) and in-combination with i) other Forth and Tay offshore wind farms (F&T) and ii) other UK North Sea offshore windfarms (UK N Sea) according to the Developer and Scoping Approaches to assessment.  = potential for AEoI,  = no potential for AEoI.

Table 6.1: Summary of Potential Adverse Effect on Integrity (AEoI) for Breeding Seabird SPAs for Proposed Development alone (Alone) and in-combination with i) other Forth and Tay offshore wind farms (F&T) and ii) other UK North Sea offshore windfarms (UK N Sea) according to the Developer and Scoping Approaches to assessment. = potential for AEoI, = no potential for AEoI.

7.             References

7. References

Anker-Nilssen,T., and Røstad, O.W. (1993). Census and Monitoring of Puffins Fratercula arctica on Røst, N Norway, 1979-1988. Ornis Scandinavica (Scandinavian Journal of Ornithology), 24(1), 1–9.

Band, W. (2012) Using a collision risk model to assess bird collision risks for offshore wind farms. The Crown Estate Strategic Ornithological Support Services (SOSS) report SOSS-02. SOSS Website. Original published Sept 2011, extended to deal with flight height distribution data March 2012

Banyard, A. C., Lean, F., Robinson, C., Howie, F., Tyler, G., Nisbet, C., Seekings, J., Meyer, S., Whittard, E., Ashpitel, H.F. and Bas, M. (2022). Detection of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus H5N1 Clade 2.3.4.4b in Great Skuas: A Species of Conservation Concern in Great Britain. Viruses, 14(2), pp.212.

Birchenough, S. N. R. and Degraer, S. (2020). Science in support of ecologically sound decommissioning strategies for offshore man-made structures: taking stock of current knowledge and considering future challenges, ICES Journal of Marine Science, Volume 77, Issue 3, Pages 1075–1078, https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsaa039.

Bogdanova, M.I., Wischnewski, S., Cleasby, I., Whyte, K, Regan, C., Gunn, C., Newell, M., Benninghaus, E., Lopez, S.L., Quintin, M., Witcutt, E., Kinchin-Smith, D., Holmes, E., Fox, D., Searle, K., Butler, A., Jones, E., McCluskie, A. and Daunt, F. (2022). Seabird GPS tracking on the Isle of May, Fowlsheugh and St Abb’s Head in 2021 in relation to offshore wind farms in the Forth / Tay region. Issue no. 2.0 (31st August 2022). Unpublished report to Neart na Gaoithe Offshore Wind Limited and SSE Renewables.

Bowgen, K. and Cook, A. (2018) Bird Collision Avoidance: Empirical evidence and impact assessments, JNCC Report No. 614, JNCC, Peterborough, ISSN 0963-8091

BOWL (2021a) Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Post-Construction Sandeel Survey–Technical Report

BOWL (2021b) Beatrice Offshore Wind Farm Post-Construction Cod Spawning Survey – Technical Report

Buckingham, L., Bogdanova, M. I., Green, J. A., Dunn, R. E., Wanless, S., Bennett, S., Bevan, R. M., Call, A., Canham, M., Corse, C. J., Harris, M. P., Heward, C. J., Jardine, D. C., Lennon, J., Parnaby, D., Redfern, C. P. F., Scott, L., Swann, R. L., Ward, R. M., … Daunt, F. (2022). Interspecific variation in non-breeding aggregation: A multi-colony tracking study of two sympatric seabirds. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 684, 181– 197

Butler, A., Carroll, M., Searle, K., Bolton, M., Waggitt, J., Evans, P., Rehfisch, M., Goddard, B., et al. (2020). Attributing seabirds at sea to appropriate breeding colonies. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science 11(8). Marine Scotland Science.

Camphuysen, C.J. & Gear, S.C. (2022). Great Skuas and Northern Gannets on Foula, summer 2022 - an unprecedented, H5N1 related massacre. NIOZ Report 2022-02, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research: Texel. 66pp. https://doi.org/10.25850/nioz/7b.b.gd

Carroll, M.J., Bolton, M., Owen, E., Anderson, G.Q.A., Mackley, E.K., Dunn, E.K. and Furness, R.W. (2017). Kittiwake breeding success in the southern North Sea correlates with prior sandeel fishing mortality. Aquatic Conservation 27: 1164-1175.

Cleasby IR, Owen E, Wilson LJ, Bolton M (2018) Combining habitat modelling and hotspot analysis to reveal the location of high density seabird areas across the UK: Technical Report. RSPB Research Report no. 63. RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, RSPB, The Lodge, Sandy, Bedfordshire, SG19 2DL.

Cook, A.S.C.P. (2021). Additional analysis to inform SNCB recommendations regarding collision risk modelling. BTO Research Report 739.

Cook, A.S.C.P., Humphreys, E.M., Masden, E.A. and Burton, N.H.K. (2014). The Avoidance Rates of Collision Between Birds and Offshore Turbines. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science, vol. 5, no.16. Marine Scotland Science.

Cook, A.S.C.P and Robinson, R.A. (2015). Testing sensitivity of metrics of seabird population response to offshore wind farm effects. JNCC Report no. 553. JNCC, Peterborough.

Coulson, J.C. 2011. The Kittiwake. T & AD Poyser, London.

Coulson, J.C. 2017. Productivity of the black-legged kittiwake Rissa tridactyla required to maintain numbers. Bird Study 64: 84-89.

Coulson, J.C., Monaghan, P., Butterfield, J.E.L., Duncan, N., Ensor, K., Shedden, C. & Thomas, C. (1984). Scandinavian herring gulls wintering in Britain. Ornis Scandinavica,15, 79-88.

Daunt, F., Bogdanova, M., McDonald, C. and Wanless, S. (2015). Determining important marine areas used by European shag breeding on the Isle of May that might merit consideration as additional SPAs (2012). JNCC Report No 556. JNCC, Peterborough

DEFRA. (2022). 6 June 2022: Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) in the UK and Europe. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/avian-influenza-bird-flu-in-europe. Accessed on: 12 August 2022

Dehnhard, N., Skei, J., Christensen‑Dalsgaard, S., May, R., Halley, D., Ringsby, T.H., Lorentsen, S-H. (2020). Boat disturbance effects on moulting common eiders Somateria mollissima. Marine Biology 167:12.

del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (eds). (1996). Handbook of the Birds of the World, Vol. 3: Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain

Dierschke, V; Furness, R.W., Gray, C.E.; Petersen, I.K., Schmutz, J., Zydelis, R. and Daunt, F. (2017). Possible Behavioural, Energetic and Demographic Effects of Displacement of Red-throated Divers. JNCC Report No. 605. JNCC, Peterborough.

Dunn, R., Wanless, S., Green, J., Harris, M. and Daunt, F. (2019). Effects of body size, sex, parental care and moult strategies on auk diving behaviour outside the breeding season. Journal of Avian Biology. 50. 10.1111/jav.02012.

Eaton M. (2021) Rare Breeding Birds in the UK in 2019. British Birds vol. 114, issue 11, pp 646–⁠704.

Finney, S.K., Harris, M.P., Keller, L.F., Elston, D.A., Monaghan, P. and Wanless, S. (2003). Reducing the Density of Breeding Gulls Influences the Pattern of Recruitment of Immature Atlantic Puffins Fratercula arctica to a Breeding Colony. Journal of Applied Ecology, 40, 545-552

Fliessbach KL, Borkenhagen K, Guse N, Markones N, Schwemmer P and Garthe S (2019) A Ship Traffic Disturbance Vulnerability Index for Northwest European Seabirds as a Tool for Marine Spatial Planning. Front. Mar. Sci. 6:192.doi: 10.3389/fmars.2019.00192;

Forni, P., Morkunas, J. and Daunys, D. (2022). Response of Long-Tailed Duck (Clangula hyemalis) to the Change in the Main Prey Availability in Its Baltic Wintering Ground. Animals. 12. 355. 10.3390/ani12030355.

Forrester, R. W., Andrews I J, McInerny C J, Murray R D, McGowan R Y, Zonfrillo B, Betts M W, Jardine D C & Grundy D S (eds) 2007. The Birds of Scotland. The Scottish Ornithologists' Club, Aberlady

Fort, J., Pettex, E., Tremblay, Y., Lorentsen, S.-H., Garthe, S., Votier, S., Pons, J.-B., Siorat, F., Furness, R.W., Grecian, J.W., Bearhop, S., Montevecchi, W.A. & Grémillet, D. (2012) Meta-population evidence of oriented chain-migration in Northern gannets. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 237-242.

Fox, A.D. (2003).  Diet and habitat use of scoters Melanitta in the Western Palearctic - a brief overview. Wildfowl 2003: 54: 160 – 182.

Frederiksen, M., Wanless, S., Harris, M. P., Rothery, P., & Wilson, L. J. (2004) The role of industrial fisheries and oceanographic change in the decline of North Sea black‐legged kittiwakes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 1129-1139.

Frederiksen, M., Moe, B., Daunt, F., Phillips, R.A. and others (2012) Multicolony tracking reveals the winter distribution of a pelagic seabird on an ocean basin scale. Diversity and Distributions 18: 530−542

Furness, R. (2015). Non-breeding season populations of seabirds in UK waters: Population sizes for Biologically Defined Minimum Population Scales (BDMPS). Natural England Commissioned Report 164.

Furness, R.W. and Birkhead, T.R. 1984. Seabird colony distributions suggest competition for food supplies during the breeding season. Nature 311: 655-656.

Furness, R. W., Wade, H. M., and Masden, E. A. (2013). Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. Journal of Environmental Management, 119, 56-66

Garthe, S. and Hüppop, O. (2004). Scaling Possible Adverse Effects of Marine Wind Farms on Seabirds: Developing and Applying a Vulnerability Index. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41(4), 724-734.

Goodship, N. and Furness, R.W. (2019). Seaweed hand-harvesting: literature review of disturbance distances and vulnerabilities of marine and coastal birds. Scottish Natural Heritage Research Report No. 1096.

Goodship, N.M. and Furness, R.W. (2022).  Disturbance Distances Review: An updated literature review of disturbance distances of selected bird species. NatureScot Research Report 1283.Hall, R. M. (2022). The impact of avian flu. National Trust Scotland. Available at: https://www.nts.org.uk/stories/the impact-of-avian-flu. Accessed on: 19 July 2022

Harris, M. P., and Wanless, S. (1986). The food of young razorbills on the Isle of May and a comparison with that of young Guillemots and Puffins. Ornis Scandinavica (Scandinavian Journal of Ornithology), 17(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/3676751.

Harris, M.P. and Wanless, S. (2011) The Puffin. T & AD Poyser, London.

Harris, M.P., Daunt, F., Newell, M., Phillips, R.A. and Wanless, S. (2010). Wintering areas of adult Atlantic puffins Fratercula arctica from a North Sea colony as revealed by geolocation technology. Marine Biology, 157, 827–836.

Hillersøy, H and Lorentsen, S.H (2012). Annual Variation in the Diet of Breeding European Shag (Phalacrocorax aristotelis) in Central Norway Waterbirds: The International Journal of Waterbird Biology Vol. 35, No. 3 (September 2012), pp. 420-429 (10 pages).

Horswill, C., O’Brien, S.H. and Robinson, R.A. (2016). Density dependence and marine bird populations: are wind farm assessments precautionary? Journal of Applied Ecology 54: 1406-1414.

ICOL (2018) Habitats Regulations Appraisal for the Inch Cape Wind Farm. Inch Cape Offshore Limited.

Jarrett, D., Cook, A.S.C.P., Woodward, I., Ross, K., Horswill, C., Dadam, D. and Humphreys, E.M. 2018. Short-term behavioural responses of wintering waterbirds to marine activity. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science 9 (7).

Jarrett, D., Calladine, J., Cook, A.S.C.P, Upton, A., Williams, J., Williams, S., Wilson, J.M., Wilson, M.W., Woodward I. and Humphreys, E.M. (2022): Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to marine traffic in the near- shore environment. Bird Study, DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2022.2113855

Jessopp, M.J., Cronin, M., Doyle, T.K., Wilson, M., McQuatters-Gollop, A., Newton, S., and Phillips, R.A. (2013). Transatlantic migration by post breeding puffins: a strategy to exploit a temporarily abundant food resource? Marine Biology, 160, 2755–2762.

Jitlal, M., Burthe, S. Freeman, S. & Daunt, F. (2017). Testing and validating metrics of change produced by Population Viability Analysis (PVA) (Ref CR/2014/16). Draft report to Scottish Government.

Johnston, A., Cook, A.S.C.P., Wright, L.J., Humphreys, E.M. and Burton, E.H.K. (2014a) Modelling flight heights of marine birds to more accurately assess collision risk with offshore wind turbines. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 31-41.

Johnston, A., Cook, A.S.C.P., Wright, L.J., Humphreys, E.M. and Burton, N.H.K. (2014b) Corrigendum. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12260

Kaiser M.J, Galanidi M., Showler D.A., Elliot A.J., Caldow, R.W./G., Rees E.I.S., Stillman  R.A. and Sutherland  W.J. (2006).  Distribution  and behaviour of Common scoter Melanitta nigra  relative to prey resources  and environmental parameters.  Ibis (2006) 148, pp 110-128.

Kleinschmidt, B., Burger, C., Dorsch, M. et al (2019) The diet of red-throated divers (Gavia stellata) overwintering in the German Bight (North Sea) analysed using molecular diagnostics. Mar Biol 166, 77 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-019-3523-3.

Kubetzki, U., Garthe, S., Fifield, D., Mendel, B. & Furness, R.W. (2009). Individual migratory schedules and wintering areas of northern gannets. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 391, 257-265.

Lane, J.V., Jeavons, R., Deakin, Z., Sherley, R.B., Pollock, C.J., Wanless, R.J. and Hamer, K.C. (2020). Vulnerability of northern gannets to offshore wind farms; seasonal and sex-specific collision risk and demographic consequences. Marine Environmental Research, 162, 105196.

Langston, R.H.W., Teuton, E. and Butler, A. (2013). Foraging ranges of northern gannets Morus bassanus in relation to proposed offshore wind farms in the UK: 2010 – 2012. RSPB report to DECC.

Lawson, J., Kober, K., Win, I., Bingham, C., Buxton, N.E., Mudge, G., Webb, A., Reid, J.B., Black, J., Way, L. and O’Brien, S. (2015). An assessment of numbers of wintering divers, seaduck and grebes in inshore marine areas of Scotland. JNCC Report No 567. JNCC, Peterborough.

Leopold, M., Kats, R.K.H. and Ens, B. (2001). Diet (preferences) of common eiders Somateria mollissima. Wadden Sea Newslett. (2001), 1: 25-31. 1.

MacArthur Green 2015. Information for Habitats Regulations Assessment. Appendix 4: Apportioning of the Flamborough Head and Filey Coast pSPA Kittiwake Population Among North Sea Offshore Wind Farms. Document reference – 5.4 (4). East Anglia THREE Limited.

MacArthur Green (2017) Estimates of ornithological headroom in offshore wind farm collision mortality. Report to The Crown Estate.

MacArthur Green and RHDHV (2021). East Anglia TWO and East Anglia ONE North Offshore Windfarms. Deadline 11 Offshore ornithology cumulative and in-combination collision risk and displacement update. Document Reference: ExA.AS-3.D11.V1.

Marine Scotland (2014). Appropriate Assessment for the Forth and Tay Developments.  appropriate_assessment_redacted_0.pdf (marine.gov.scot).

Marine Scotland (2017a). Scoping Opinion for the proposed Section 36 Consent and Associated Marine Licence Application for the revised Inch Cape offshore wind farm and revised Inch Cape Offshore Transmission Works.

Marine Scotland (2017b). Scoping Opinion for the proposed Section 36 Consent and Associated Marine Licence Application for the Revised NnG Offshore Wind Farm and Revised NnG Offshore Transmission Works. Available from http://www.gov.scot/Topics/marine/Licensing/marine/scoping/NnGRev2017/SO-092017

Marine Scotland (2017c). Scoping Opinion for the proposed Section 36 Consent and Associated Marine Licence Application for the revised Seagreen Phase 1 offshore project.

Martin, M. (2022). RSPB Avian Influenza update. RSPB. Available at: https://community.rspb.org.uk/ourwork/b/scotland/posts/avian-influenza-update Accessed on: 19 July 2022. 

Masden, E. A., Haydon, D. T., Fox, A. D., and Furness, R. W. (2010). Barriers to movement: modelling energetic costs of avoiding marine wind farms amongst breeding seabirds. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60: 1085-1091.

McGregor, R.M., King, S., Donovan, C.R., Caneco, B., Webb, A. (2018) A Stochastic Collision Risk Model for Seabirds in Flight. HiDef BioConsult Scientific Report to Marine Scotland, 06/04/2018, Issue I, 59 pp

Mitchell, P.I., Newton, S.F., Ratcliffe, N. and Dunn, T.E. (2004). Seabird Populations of Britain and Ireland. T & AD Poyser, London

Mitchell, C., Griffin, L., Maciver, A., Minshull, B., & Makan, N. (2016). Use of GPS tags to describe the home ranges, migration routes, stop-over locations and breeding area of Taiga Bean Geese Anser fabalis fabalis wintering in central Scotland. Bird Study, 63(4), 437–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2016.1236779

Mobbs, D., Searle, K., Daunt, F. and Butler, A. (2020). A Population Viability Analysis Modelling Tool for Seabird Species: Guide for using the PVA tool (v2.0) user interface. Available at: https://github.com/naturalengland/Seabird_PVA_Tool/blob/master/Documentation/PVA_Tool_UI_Guidance.pdf. Accessed: November 2021.

Murray, S., Wanless, S. and Harris, M.P. (2014) The Bass Rock – now the world’s largest Northern gannet colony. British Birds, 107, 765-769.

Murray, S., Harris, M.P. and Wanless, S. (2015). The status of the gannet in Scotland in 2013 – 14. Scottish Birds, 35, 3 – 18.

Natural England (2020). Natural England’s comments in relation to the Norfolk Boreas updated ornithological assessment, submitted at Deadline 2 [REP2-035]. PINS Ref REP4-040.

Natural England (2022a) Offshore Wind Marine Environmental Assessments: Best Practice Advice for Evidence and Data Standards. Phase I: Expectations for pre-application baseline data for designated nature conservation and landscape receptors to support offshore wind applications and Phase III: Expectations for data analysis and presentation at examination for offshore wind applications. Environmental considerations for offshore wind and cable projects - Home (sharepoint.com)

Natural England (2022b) Natural England interim advice on updated Collision Risk Modelling parameters (July 2022). Appendix B1 in Sheringham Shoal Extension and Dudgeon Extension Offshore Wind Farms. Relevant Representations of Natural England. EN010109-000540-Natural England - Relevant Representation.pdf (planninginspectorate.gov.uk)

Natural England (2022c) Sheringham Shoal Extension and Dudgeon Extension Offshore Wind Farms. Relevant Representations of Natural England. EN010109-000540-Natural England - Relevant Representation.pdf (planninginspectorate.gov.uk)

Natural England (2022d) Designated Sites View – Flamborough and Filey Coast SPA. https://designatedsites.naturalengland.org.uk/Marine/MarineSiteDetail.aspx?SiteCode=UK9006101&SiteName=flamb&countyCode=&responsiblePerson=&SeaArea=&IFCAArea=

NatureScot 2018, Use of Avoidance Rates in the SNH Wind Farm Collision Risk Model,  Wind farm impacts on birds - Use of Avoidance Rates in the SNH Wind Farm Collision Risk Model.pdf (nature.scot)

NatureScot (2020).  Citation for Special Protection Area (SPA) Outer Firth of Forth and St Andrews Bay Complex  (UK9020316). 03/12/2020.

NatureScot (2020) Seasonal periods for birds in the Scottish marine environment. Guidance note version 2 (October 2020). Guidance note - Seasonal definitions for birds in the Scottish Marine Environment.pdf (nature.scot) Accessed on 21/10/2022.

NatureScot and JNCC (2021).  Outer Firth of Forth and St Andrews Bay Complex Special Protection Area (SPA) draft Conservation Objectives.  NatureScot and Joint Nature Conservation Committee. November 2021.

NatureScot and JNCC (2022).  Conservation and Management advice: Outer Firth of Forth and St Andrews Bay Complex SPA.  UK Site: 9020316.  NatureScot and Joint Nature Conservation Committee. June 2022.

NatureScot. (2022a). Island nature reserves close to protect seabirds. Available at: https://www.nature.scot/island nature-reserves-close-protect-seabirds. Accessed on: 15 August 2022

Norman, T and Ellis, I. (2005).  Observations of the effects of disturbance by boat survey vessel on diver species at London Array.  RPS Report for London Array Ltd.

Peschko V, Mendel B, Müller S, Markones N, Mercker M, Garthe S. (2020) Effects of offshore windfarms on seabird abundance: Strong effects in spring and in the breeding season. Marine Environmental Research 162:105-157

Peschko, V., Mendel, B., Mercker, M., Dierschke, J. and Garthe, S. (2021). Northern gannets (Morus bassanus) are strongly affected by operating offshore wind farms during the breeding season. Journal of Environmental Management, 279, 111509.

Philip, E. and Tyler, G. (2022) Weathering the storm: A policy Update. The 15th International Seabird Group Conference, Cork Ireland, seabird conference cork, 22nd to 25th August 2022.

PINS (2022) Advice Note Seventeen: Cumulative Effects Assessment. Available online from: https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/legislation-and-advice/advice-notes/ [Accessed November 2022]

Revised Scoping Opinion for Inch Cape, 2017 Scoping Opinion for Inch Cape 10 August 2017 Offshore Windfarm – Revised Design Parameters – Ornithology 00523413.pdf (marine.gov.scot)

Robinson, R.A. (2005) BirdFacts: profiles of birds occurring in Britain & Ireland. BTO, Thetford (http://www.bto.org/birdfacts, accessed on 23 November 2022)

Royal HaskoningDHV, MacArthur Green and Apem Ltd. (2015) Information for the Habitats Regulations Assessment. Document reference – 5.4. East Anglia THREE Limited.

Royal HaskoningDHV (2022). Sheringham Shoal and Dudgeon Offshore Wind Farm Extension Projects. Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment (RIAA). Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment (planninginspectorate.gov.uk)

RPS (2019), Review of Cable installation, protection, migration and habitat recoverability, The Crown Estate, Rev03.

Schwemmer P., Mendel B., Sonntag N, Dierschke V and Garthe S. (2011). Effects of ship traffic on seabirds in offshore waters: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning. Ecological Applications 21: 1851-1860.

Scott, B. (2022) Impact of offshore wind on marine food chain to be explored. Available at https://www.abdn.ac.uk/news/16297/. Accessed on 21/10/2022.

Searle, K. R., Mobbs, D.C., Butler, A., Furness, R.W., Trinder, M.N. and Daunt, F. (2018). Finding out the Fate of Displaced Birds. Scottish Marine and Freshwater Science Vol 9 No 8, 149pp

Searle, K., Mobbs, D., Daunt, F., and Butler, A. (2019). A Population Viability Analysis Modelling Tool for Seabird Species. Centre for Ecology and Hydrology report for Natural England. Natural England Commissioned Report NECR274. pp.23

Shoji, A., Dean, B., Kirk, H., Freeman, R., Perrins, C. and Guilford, T. (2016). The diving behaviour of the Manx Shearwater Puffinus puffinus. Ibis. 158. 10.1111/ibi.12381

Skov, H., Heinänen, S., Norman, T., Ward, R.M., Méndez-Roldán, S. and Ellis, I. (2018) ORJIP Bird Collision and Avoidance Study. Final report – April 2018. The Carbon Trust, United Kingdom.

SNCBs (2014) Joint response from the Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies to the Marine Scotland Science avoidance rate review.

SNCBs (2022). Joint SNCB Interim Displacement Advice Note. Joint SNCB Interim Displacement Advice Note (jncc.gov.uk)

SMP (2021). Seabird Monitoring Programme Database. [Online]. https://app.bto.org/seabirds/public/index.jsp.

SMP (2022). Seabird Monitoring Programme Database. [Online]. https://app.bto.org/seabirds/public/index.jsp.

Smyth, K., Christie, N., Burdon, D., Atkins, J.P., Barnes, R. and Elliott, M., 2015. Renewables-to-reefs?–Decommissioning options for the offshore wind power industry. Marine pollution bulletin, 90(1-2), pp.247-258.SNCB (2014). Joint response from the Statutory Nature Conservation Bodies to the Marine Scotland Science avoidance rate review.

SNCB (2022) Joint SNCB Interim Displacement Advice Note.

SNH (2015).  Outer Firth of Forth and St Andrews Bay Complex Proposed Special Protection Area (pSPA): Advice to support management.  Scottish Natural Heritage.

SNH and JNCC (2016).  Outer Firth of Forth and St Andrews Bay Complex Proposed Special Protection Area (pSPA) NO. UK9020316 SPA Site Selection Document:  Summary of the scientific case for site selection. Scottish Natural Heritage and Joint Nature Conservation Committee.

St. John Glew, K., Wanless, S., Harris, M.P. Daunt, F., Erikstad, K.E., Strom, H., Speakman, J.R., Kurten, B., Truemen, C.N. (2019). Sympatric Atlantic puffins and razorbills show contrasting responses to adverse marine conditions during winter foraging within the North Sea. Mov Ecol 7, 33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-019-0174-4.

Stone, C.J., Webb, A., Barton, C., Ratcliffe, N., Reed, T.C., Tasker, M.L., Camphuysen, C.J. and Pienkowski, M.W. (1995). An atlas of seabird distribution in north-west European waters. JNCC, Peterborough.

SSER (2020) 2020 Berwick Bank Wind Farm Scoping Report.

SSER (2021b) Berwick Bank Wind Farm Onshore HRA Screening Report.

SSER (2022), Berwick Bank Wind Farm Offshore EIA Report.

Swann, R. Harris, M. and Aiton, D. (2008). The diet of European Shag Phalacrocorax aristotelis, Black-legged Kittiwake Rissa tridactyla and Common Guillemot Uria aalge on Canna during the chick-rearing period 1981–2007. Seabird. 21. 44-54.

Swann, B. (2016) Seabird counts at East Caithness Cliffs SPA for marine renewable casework. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 902.

Schwemmer, P., Mercker, M., Vanselow, K.H. et al. (2021) Migrating curlews on schedule: departure and arrival patterns of a long-distance migrant depend on time and breeding location rather than on wind conditions. Movement Ecology, 9, 9

Votier, S, Bearhop, S., Ratcliffe, N., Phillips, R. and Furness, R. (2004). Predation by great skuas at a large Shetland colony. Journal of Applied Ecology. 41. 1117 - 1128. 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00974.x.

Wade, H.M., Masden, E.A., Jackson, A.C., Thaxter, C.B., Burton, N.H.K., Bouten, W. & Furness R.W. (2014). Great skua (Stercorarius skua) movements at sea in relation to marine renewable energy developments, Mar. Environ. Res., 101 (2014), pp. 69-80, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.09.003

Wakefield, E.D., Bodey, T.W., Bearhop, S., Blackburn, J., Colhoun, K., Davies, R., Dwyer, R.G., Green, J., Grémillet, D., Jackson, A.L. et al. (2013). Space partitioning without territoriality in gannets. Science 341: 68-70.

Wakefield, E. D., Owen, E., Baer, J., Carroll, M. J., Daunt, F., Dodd, S. G., Green, J. A., Guilford, T., Mavor, R. A., Miller, P. I., Newell, M. A., Newton, S. F., Robertson, G. S., Shoji, A., Soanes, L. M., Votier, S. C., Wanless, S. and Bolton, M. (2017) Breeding density, fine-scale tracking, and large-scale modelling reveal the regional distribution of four seabird species. Ecological Applications, 27, 2074–2091.

Walsh, P.M., Halley, D.J., Harris, M.P., del Nevo, A., Sim, I.M.W. and Tasker, M.L. (1995) Seabird monitoring handbook for Britain and Ireland: A compilation of methods for survey and monitoring of breeding seabirds. JNCC, RSPB, ITE and the Seabird Group. Available at: Seabird monitoring handbook for Britain and Ireland (jncc.gov.uk)

Wanless, S., Bacon, P.J., Harris, M.P., Webb, A.D., Greenstreet, S.P.R. and Webb, A. (1997). Modelling environmental and energetic effects on feeding performance and distribution of shags (Phalacrocorax aristotelis): integrating telemetry, geographical information systems, and modelling techniques. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 54, 524-544.

Wernham, C.V.,Toms, M. P., Marchant, J. H., Clark, J. A., Siriwardena, G. M., & Baillie, S. R. (eds.) 2002. The Migration Atlas: Movements of the Birds of Britain and Ireland. Poyser, London.

Wischnewski, S., Fox, D.S., McCluskie, A. and Wright, L.J. (2018). Seabird tracking at the Flamborough Head and Filey Coast: Assessing the impacts of offshore wind turbines. Pilot study 2017: Fieldwork and recommendations. Hornsea Project Three Offshore Wind Farm – Appendix 7 to Deadline 2 Submission.

Woodward, I., Thaxter, C.B., Owen, E. & Cook, A.S.C.P. (2019). Desk-based revision of seabird foraging ranges used for HRA screening, Report of work carried out by the British Trust for Ornithology on behalf of NIRAS and The Crown Estate.

Woodward, I., Aebischer, N., Burnell, D., Eaton, M., Frost, T., Hall, C.,  Stroud, D. and Noble D. (2020). Population estimates of birds in Great Britain and the United Kingdom. British Birds 113: 69–104 February 2020 – vol. 113, issue 2, pp 69–⁠104.

Wright, L. J., Ross-Smith, V. H., Austin, G. E., Massimino, D., Dadam, D., Cook, A. S. C. P., Calbrade, N. A., & Burton, N. H. K. (2012, October). Assessing the risk of offshore wind farm development to migratory birds designated as features of UK Special Protection Areas (and other Annex 1 species). BTO. https://www.bto.org/sites/default/files/u28/downloads/Projects/final-report-soss05.pdf

WWT Consulting. (2014). MS strategic level report of collision risk of Scottish offshore wind farms to migrating birds. https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/impact-assessment/2014/10/scottish-marine-freshwater-science-volume-5-number-12-strategic-assessment/documents/00461026-pdf/00461026-pdf/govscot%3Adocument/00461026.pdf


Appendix 3A: European Site Information

Appendix 3A: European Site Information

This Appendix provides site-specific information for all of the designated sites considered in the draft RIAA, including site characterisations, current conservation condition and the conservation objectives. This appendix is provided as a standalone document.