Annex C Auk Displacement Mortality for the Berwick Bank Development Array plus 2km buffer: SPATIAL Approach
- For context, the Applicant has used the Matrix method, to explore outputs based on different displacement rates applied spatially (“Spatial Approach”) across the Array area and buffer. The approach has been applied to auks, and area-specific displacement rates applied within the 2km buffer and the Development Array (see ‘Spatial Approach” in Table 3.4).
- Matrices for the ‘2km buffer only’ were formulated by subtracting the matrices for the Development Array from the matrices for the Development Array plus 2km buffer (displayed in sections 0 to 0) and are presented below in Table C.1 to Table C.6.
- The outputs highlighted in colour are those deemed the ‘most realistic’ mortality estimates, based on the displacement and mortality rates as advised by the: i) Scoping Opinion (highlighted in dark teal; rates outlined in Table 3.4) and ii) the “Spatial Approach” (highlighted in orange). For the Spatial Approach, the Developer uses a displacement rate of 30% and mortality rate of 1% for all auk species in all seasons within the 2km buffer. Cells highlighted in light teal outline the potential associated uncertainty around these figures.
- The figures highlighted in orange from the Development Array matrices based on a displacement rate of 50% and mortality rate of 1% for all auk species in all season) and the 2km buffer only matrices were then summed to get the final mortality values across the Development Array plus 2km buffer with regards to the Spatial Approach. These are displayed in Table C.7 along with the outputs from the Developer Approach for comparison.
Guillemot
(Breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 15 | 29 | 43 | 58 | 72 | 145 | 217 | 290 | 434 | 723 | 1157 | 1447 | |
20% | 0 | 29 | 58 | 86 | 116 | 145 | 290 | 434 | 579 | 868 | 1447 | 2314 | 2893 | |
30% | 0 | 43 | 86 | 130 | 173 | 217 | 434 | 650 | 868 | 1301 | 2170 | 3471 | 4339 | |
40% | 0 | 58 | 116 | 173 | 231 | 290 | 579 | 868 | 1157 | 1736 | 2893 | 4629 | 5786 | |
50% | 0 | 72 | 145 | 217 | 290 | 361 | 723 | 1085 | 1447 | 2170 | 3616 | 5786 | 7232 | |
60% | 0 | 86 | 173 | 260 | 347 | 434 | 868 | 1301 | 1736 | 2603 | 4339 | 6942 | 8678 | |
70% | 0 | 102 | 203 | 304 | 405 | 506 | 1012 | 1519 | 2025 | 3038 | 5062 | 8100 | 10124 | |
80% | 0 | 116 | 231 | 347 | 462 | 579 | 1157 | 1736 | 2314 | 3471 | 5786 | 9257 | 11572 | |
90% | 0 | 130 | 260 | 391 | 521 | 650 | 1301 | 1952 | 2603 | 3905 | 6509 | 10414 | 13018 | |
100% | 0 | 145 | 290 | 434 | 579 | 723 | 1447 | 2170 | 2893 | 4340 | 7232 | 11572 | 14464 |
Guillemot
(Non-breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 101 | 152 | 203 | 304 | 507 | 810 | 1014 | |
20% | 0 | 20 | 40 | 61 | 81 | 101 | 203 | 304 | 405 | 608 | 1014 | 1621 | 2027 | |
30% | 0 | 30 | 61 | 91 | 122 | 152 | 304 | 456 | 608 | 912 | 1520 | 2432 | 3040 | |
40% | 0 | 40 | 81 | 122 | 162 | 203 | 405 | 608 | 810 | 1216 | 2027 | 3242 | 4053 | |
50% | 0 | 50 | 101 | 152 | 203 | 254 | 507 | 760 | 1014 | 1520 | 2533 | 4053 | 5067 | |
60% | 0 | 61 | 122 | 183 | 244 | 304 | 608 | 912 | 1216 | 1824 | 3040 | 4864 | 6080 | |
70% | 0 | 71 | 142 | 213 | 283 | 354 | 709 | 1064 | 1418 | 2128 | 3546 | 5674 | 7093 | |
80% | 0 | 81 | 162 | 244 | 324 | 405 | 810 | 1216 | 1621 | 2432 | 4053 | 6485 | 8106 | |
90% | 0 | 91 | 183 | 273 | 365 | 456 | 912 | 1368 | 1824 | 2736 | 4559 | 7296 | 9119 | |
100% | 0 | 101 | 203 | 304 | 405 | 507 | 1014 | 1520 | 2027 | 3040 | 5067 | 8106 | 10133 |
Razorbill
(Breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 30 | 49 | 80 | 99 | |
20% | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 60 | 99 | 160 | 199 | |
30% | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 15 | 30 | 45 | 60 | 90 | 150 | 239 | 300 | |
40% | 0 | 4 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 119 | 199 | 319 | 399 | |
50% | 0 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 24 | 49 | 74 | 99 | 149 | 249 | 399 | 499 | |
60% | 0 | 6 | 12 | 18 | 23 | 30 | 60 | 90 | 119 | 180 | 300 | 479 | 599 | |
70% | 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 70 | 105 | 140 | 210 | 350 | 559 | 699 | |
80% | 0 | 8 | 16 | 23 | 32 | 40 | 80 | 119 | 160 | 239 | 399 | 639 | 798 | |
90% | 0 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 36 | 45 | 90 | 135 | 180 | 269 | 449 | 718 | 898 | |
100% | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 49 | 99 | 149 | 199 | 299 | 499 | 798 | 998 |
Table C.4: Potential razorbill mortality in the 2km buffer only, following displacement from the Berwick Bank Development Array in the non-breeding season. Estimates considered, in light of empirical evidence, to represent the most realistic scenarios are colour coded, with dark teal representing rates advised by the Scoping Opinion; orange representing rates defined by the Spatial Approach; and light teal representing uncertainty around these figures.
Razorbill
(Non-breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 15 | 18 | 36 | 55 | 73 | 109 | 181 | 291 | 363 | |
20% | 0 | 7 | 15 | 22 | 29 | 36 | 73 | 109 | 146 | 218 | 363 | 582 | 727 | |
30% | 0 | 11 | 22 | 33 | 44 | 55 | 109 | 164 | 218 | 328 | 545 | 873 | 1091 | |
40% | 0 | 15 | 29 | 44 | 58 | 73 | 146 | 218 | 291 | 437 | 727 | 1163 | 1455 | |
50% | 0 | 18 | 36 | 55 | 73 | 90 | 181 | 272 | 363 | 545 | 909 | 1455 | 1819 | |
60% | 0 | 22 | 44 | 66 | 87 | 109 | 218 | 328 | 437 | 655 | 1091 | 1746 | 2182 | |
70% | 0 | 25 | 51 | 76 | 102 | 127 | 255 | 382 | 509 | 764 | 1273 | 2037 | 2546 | |
80% | 0 | 29 | 58 | 87 | 116 | 146 | 291 | 437 | 582 | 873 | 1455 | 2327 | 2910 | |
90% | 0 | 33 | 66 | 98 | 131 | 164 | 328 | 491 | 655 | 982 | 1637 | 2619 | 3274 | |
100% | 0 | 36 | 73 | 109 | 146 | 181 | 363 | 545 | 727 | 1091 | 1819 | 2910 | 3637 |
Puffin
(Breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 34 | 56 | 90 | 113 | |
20% | 0 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 9 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 45 | 67 | 113 | 180 | 225 | |
30% | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 34 | 51 | 67 | 101 | 168 | 270 | 336 | |
40% | 0 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 23 | 45 | 67 | 90 | 135 | 225 | 360 | 450 | |
50% | 0 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 28 | 56 | 84 | 113 | 168 | 281 | 450 | 562 | |
60% | 0 | 7 | 14 | 20 | 27 | 34 | 67 | 101 | 135 | 202 | 336 | 539 | 673 | |
70% | 0 | 8 | 16 | 23 | 32 | 39 | 78 | 118 | 157 | 236 | 393 | 629 | 787 | |
80% | 0 | 9 | 18 | 27 | 36 | 45 | 90 | 135 | 180 | 270 | 450 | 719 | 899 | |
90% | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 51 | 101 | 152 | 202 | 303 | 505 | 809 | 1011 | |
100% | 0 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 45 | 56 | 113 | 168 | 225 | 337 | 562 | 899 | 1123 |
Table C.6: Potential puffin mortality in the 2km buffer only, following displacement from the Berwick Bank Development Array in the non-breeding season. Estimates considered, in light of empirical evidence, to represent the most realistic scenarios are colour coded, with dark teal representing rates advised by the Scoping Opinion; orange representing rates defined by the Spatial Approach; and light teal representing uncertainty around these figures.
Puffin
(Non-breeding season) | Mortality Level (% of displaced birds at risk of mortality) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 4% | 5% | 10% | 15% | 20% | 30% | 50% | 80% | 100% | |
0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
10% | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 43 | 71 | 114 | 142 | |
20% | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 12 | 14 | 28 | 43 | 57 | 86 | 142 | 228 | 285 | |
30% | 0 | 5 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 21 | 43 | 64 | 86 | 128 | 214 | 342 | 428 | |
40% | 0 | 6 | 12 | 17 | 23 | 28 | 57 | 86 | 114 | 171 | 285 | 456 | 570 | |
50% | 0 | 7 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 71 | 106 | 142 | 213 | 356 | 570 | 712 | |
60% | 0 | 9 | 17 | 25 | 34 | 43 | 86 | 128 | 171 | 257 | 428 | 684 | 855 | |
70% | 0 | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 99 | 150 | 199 | 299 | 499 | 798 | 998 | |
80% | 0 | 12 | 23 | 34 | 46 | 57 | 114 | 171 | 228 | 342 | 570 | 912 | 1140 | |
90% | 0 | 13 | 25 | 39 | 51 | 64 | 128 | 192 | 257 | 384 | 641 | 1026 | 1282 | |
100% | 0 | 14 | 28 | 43 | 57 | 71 | 142 | 213 | 285 | 427 | 712 | 1140 | 1425 |
Species | Developer Approach |
| Spatial Approach |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
| Breeding season | Non-breeding season | Breeding season | Non-breeding season |
Developer Approach |
|
|
|
|
Guillemot | 371 | 221 | 342 | 201 |
Razorbill | 21 | 62 | 19 | 55 |
Puffin | 34 | N/A | 20 | N/A |